It is Tuesday morning and all the great weather we have been experiencing here in Wisconsin is starting to wind down. It is not often that we enjoy 80 degree days in October. Oh well on with the thoughts for today.
The "N" Word
During a recent episode of the View the hosts were discussing the use of the "N" word with their guest. It was brought up that when Barbara Walters used the word while reading a comment that had been written on a wall or somewhere the guest, a black woman, became offended. However, when Whoopie Goldberg used the same word it was okay. The point was made that when a white person used the word it was a racial slur but when a black person used it, it was a term of affection. I am afraid I cannot support that idea. A racial slur, or any kind of slur, is the same no matter who uses it. The term in question was originated as an insult to blacks and was never intended as a term of endearment. It is my contention that you cannot hate people if you don't want to be hated, you cannot hurt people if you don't want to be hurt, and you cannot use racial slurs against anyone if you don't want them used against you. Now obviously I cannot tell anyone how to speak or what words are okay for what races. But I am convinced if we want to see racism eradicated it has to start with erasing these kind of words from our vocabulary. I know in some cases, such as literary works, the words are used to show the mindset of the period and we should not try to rewrite classical literature, and our young people should be aware of it so they can avoid such thinking in the future but I just don't think such language belongs in our day to day conversations. I can let my wife know I love her without saying "yo bitch".
DOJ
Once again the Presidents Department of Justice is flexing its muscle and showing those pesky states who's boss. Alabama has joined a growing list of states being sued by DOJ for having the unmitigated gall to pass a law making it illegal to enter their state illegally. And if the current administration is so fond of the illegal immigrants, why are they called illegal? Doesn't that mean against the law? If the federal government would uphold the law against entering the country "illegally" the states would not have to attempt to do it on their own. I am only 58 years old so probably don't know much but I can't think of another time in current history when a president and his administration fought so hard against the will of the people and their well being. Of course a 30 million person voter base does look pretty good when you have done such a poor job and are getting ready to be tossed out on your behind. Personally I say way to go Alabama, Arizona, and all the other states who are trying to actually protect the citizens, born and legally naturalized, in our great country.
Occupy Wall Street
So, after 3 weeks of protesting the wall street protesters finally came out with their official list of grievances. Since they were so vague I won't bother to list them here. You can find them in just about any liberal news media. What I find interesting is that fellow protesters have decided to occupy other streets around the country. One such occupation is Boston. They may not have a solid idea yet what they want but they did hold a rally for accused terrorist Terak Menhanna. He is accused of aiding Al Qaeda in its war against the USA. These morons better hope they never get some of the things they ask for because the first thing that happens is they lose their freedom to do what they are doing. Just like the people that support the president's agenda of creating a socialist state, if or when it does happen they will be the first to be subjugated.
Jail and Lashes
I found this story from Breitbart.com very interesting. It would seem if you make, or in this case star, in a movie not sanctioned by the government in Iran you could find yourself in quite a bit of trouble. An Iranian actress who starred in just such a movie has been sentenced to a year in jail and 90 lashes. The movie was about a young actress whose work in the theatre was banned so she was forced to lead a secret life to do what she loved. The Iranian government said the movie was not approved by them so was being shown illegally. So for this young lady it was jail and lashes. My question is, do we really want to embrace these folks as the president would have us do? I think not.
Do they earn this
I am going to show you something that has been going around the net for awhile and see what you think:
Salary of retired US Presidents .............$180,000 FOR LIFE
Salary of
House/Senate .......................$174, 000
FOR LIFE
Salary of Speaker of the House ............$223,500 FOR LIFE
Salary of Majority/Minority Leaders ...... $193,400 FOR LIFE
Average Salary of Soldier DEPLOYED IN AFGHANISTAN.......$38,000
this is the retirement program the politicians have given themselves for the tireless work they do for this country. My military retirement and future social security combined don't even come close to the lowest paid person on this list. Considering the state this country is in because of these people do you believe they have earned this? The condition of this country is the direct fault of the 535 members of congress. They alone are responsible for all the spending, tax increases, and job losses that plague us today. So multiply the politicians by the retirement for life and ask yourself who should be facing cutbacks. With this retirement program they still have the audacity to suggest the military retirement and social security programs need to be altered because they cost to much.
Last but not least
Human Events posted this response Herman Cain made to the president's Jobs Bill. I think it needs to be looked at. At last someone tells it like it is:
Today, the Obama Administration's assault on the private sector continued. In yet another speech, he called for America's job creators to shoulder an even heavier burden than they must already. President Obama promised that his efforts were not "class warfare," but instead "math."
Perhaps he could learn a lesson or two on math from me. I have a degree in mathematics and spent the earlier days of my career as a supervisory mathematician for the Department of the Navy. Then, I worked for 40 years as an executive in the private sector where I balanced budgets, saved failing companies and created jobs. Both obviously demanded a command of advanced mathematics.
Here's what I can tell him about math: raising taxes on anyone, no matter their income level, will do nothing to stimulate our economy, create jobs or balance our federal budget. Increasing taxes on the private sector will destroy jobs, further damaging our economy and sending even less revenue to the federal government.
His eagerness to punish the private sector indicates he doesn't understand the most important truth of basic economics: the private sector creates jobs. These are the jobs that pay for the food for our families, the roofs over our heads, the heat for our homes, the clothes on our backs, the schools for our kids and the plans for our retirement.
Perhaps his ignorance of basic economics is due to the fact that both he and more than 90 percent of his Administration have no private sector experience at all. Thus, they are all too willing to continually punish America's job creators, all in the name of "fairness."
President Obama's once said, "You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig." I agree. It doesn't matter that he calls it "paying your fair share." It's still class warfare.
That's it for today. Till next time, stay positive and God Bless.